Vibe Coding My Way to Egyptology #2 – One Year On 2026-05

Since my last Egyptology vibe coding it has been an AI Decade (one human year). How have the AI tools advanced?

Quick refresher: I want a browser 3D animation to describe my personal pet theory on how Egyptians lifted heavy stones into place.

Here is a quick comparison of the changes:

Property20252026Notes
Manual Split into Phases?RequiredAll Phases Handled2026 even had a walkthrough “Next step” button
Human FigurinesBasic cylinder with sphereHead, torso, armsThe basic humans could still be better
3D Visual LabelsOften did not workWorkedThere is still room for improvement for the labels
3D DetailsRudimentaryBeneficialButtresses, sand colouring, wood colouring, stone style texture, camera movement, mouse drag/pan, mouse-wheel zoom
Totally Black ScreensOften happened, often consecutivelyOnly Claude, and then only at the start of the session
PlanningOnly what POH inputAdded extra sensible stepsGoogle Gemini specced out the instructions well for the downstream LLMs to implement.
Session LengthFour or five steps before memslidingMany steps and refinements

2025 – How it was

The first article is Vibe Coding My Way to Egyptology – 2025-05. Claude Sonnet 3.4, ChatGPT o3 pro.


Big items: in 2025 the whole presentation needed to be split up manually. Because of limitation of the 2025 AI tools I had to break the process into two distinct phases. Phase 1 was rolling the load onto a raft, the second phase was building an enclosure, filling the enclosure with water and the load rising. Each phase had to be generated separately then stitched together in an enclosing document. so all the AI could handle was rolling the load onto a raft. lifting the raft in a pool.

Humans were just cylinders with spheres, no matter how much I asked for humanoid shapes

Labels work

2025 had frequent ‘black screens’ where asked for a change and got a black screen instead with no understanding of what was wrong. Either the tool fixed the black screen problem itself or

2025 example (one phase only shown):

Below is a blast from the past. It is one of two phases, but shows the limits of what the ChatGPT o3 pro tool was producing

2026

In 2026 now all the phases can be included in one presentation with a progression “Next Step” walkthrough button. No need for separate phases.

The humans look more human. They have arms and torsos. Their heads are human coloured.

The raft has buoyancy, a nice touch. The AI decided to add buttressing and scaffolding a good addition. The tools trivially added mouse controlled zooming and panning.

Overall look and feel. Claude made the scene look nice without explicit prompting. ChatGPT did so when requested. The specifications created from Gemini Pro asked for only rudimentary presentation, so ChatGPT more closely followed what it was requested.

ChatGPT 5.5 2026




Claude Opus 4.8 2026




Conclusion

The capabilities in 2026 are vastly improved on the same time in 2025. The presentation does not have to be split into parts by hand. There is greater detail. The humans look better. The planning understands the task better and made better instructions for the worker LLMs. It is now possible to make a stream of refinements. Will we see the same pace of advancements over the next twelve months?